Dal-Tile Corporation v. Ralf Poineal
This text of Dal-Tile Corporation v. Ralf Poineal (Dal-Tile Corporation v. Ralf Poineal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-09-00029-CV ______________________________
DAL-TILE CORPORATION, Appellant
V.
RALF POINEAL, Appellee
On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 77543
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley MEMORANDUM OPINION
Dal-Tile Corporation has filed a motion asking this Court to dismiss its appeal because the
controversy has been resolved and settled. Dal-Tile states that pursuant to their agreement, each
party will bear its own costs and fees. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure, we grant the motion in its entirety. TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(a).
We dismiss the appeal, with costs and fees taxed against the party incurring same.
Bailey C. Moseley Justice
Date Submitted: July 2, 2009 Date Decided: July 3, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dal-Tile Corporation v. Ralf Poineal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dal-tile-corporation-v-ralf-poineal-texapp-2009.