Dakota Smith v. Tim Holst
This text of Dakota Smith v. Tim Holst (Dakota Smith v. Tim Holst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 3, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0003 Lower Tribunal No. 24-11238-CA-01 ________________
Dakota Smith, Appellant,
vs.
Tim Holst, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from a non-final order the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Judge.
Dakota Smith, in proper person.
Weinbaum P.A., Lane Weinbaum (Coral Springs), and George William Wickhorst, for appellees.
Before LOGUE, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the
appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as
to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence
or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can
an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived
the law as to require reversal.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dakota Smith v. Tim Holst, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dakota-smith-v-tim-holst-fladistctapp-2025.