Dakota Nat. Bank v. Swenson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota

Dakota Nat. Bank v. Swenson

48 F. 626, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1567

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota·Decided January 5, 1892·Published

Opinion

Shihas, J.

The hill herein filed must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It does not appear that any of the taxes assessed against the complainant bank or any one of its shareholders exceeds 82,000, and hence it does not appear that the controversy involves “a matter in dispute” exceeding in value §2,000, which under the statute now in force is a requisite to the jurisdiction of this court. For the authorities and grounds m ex-tenso upon which this ruling is based, see opinion just filed in the similar case of Bank v. Swenson, 48 Fed. Rep. 621.

Edgerton, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shihas, J.

The hill herein filed must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It does not appear that any of the taxes assessed against the complainant bank or any one of its shareholders exceeds 82,000, and hence it does not appear that the controversy involves “a matter in dispute” exceeding in value §2,000, which under the statute now in force is a requisite to the jurisdiction of this court. For the authorities and grounds m ex-tenso upon which this ruling is based, see opinion just filed in the similar case of Bank v. Swenson, 48 Fed. Rep. 621.

Edgerton, J., concurs.

Dakota Nat. Bank v. Swenson, 48 F. 626, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1567 (circtdsd 1892).

Pincite

48 F. 626 (Dakota Nat. Bank v. Swenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.