Dakota Lee Hoyt v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Dakota Lee Hoyt v. the State of Texas

DecidedAugust 21, 2024

Docket11-22-00308-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Dakota Lee Hoyt v. the State of Texas (Dakota Lee Hoyt v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dakota Lee Hoyt v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Dakota Lee Hoyt, * From the 358th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. D-21-1674-CR.

Vs. No. 11-22-00308-CR * August 21, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in two of the judgments below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we affirm the trial court’s judgment for Count Two. We modify the trial court’s judgment for Counts One and Three to delete the cumulation orders and show that the sentences imposed against Appellant in those counts shall be served concurrently. As modified, we affirm the judgments of the trial court for Counts One and Three.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Dakota Lee Hoyt, * From the 358th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. D-21-1674-CR.

Vs. No. 11-22-00308-CR * August 21, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in two of the judgments below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we affirm the trial court’s judgment for Count Two. We modify the trial court’s judgment for Counts One and Three to delete the cumulation orders and show that the sentences imposed against Appellant in those counts shall be served concurrently. As modified, we affirm the judgments of the trial court for Counts One and Three.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Dakota Lee Hoyt v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dakota-lee-hoyt-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.