DAIUJUST v. State

14 So. 3d 266, 2009 WL 2243848

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DAIUJUST v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10399 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 2009·No. 3D09-1457·Published

Opinion

14 So.3d 266 (2009)

No. 3D09-1457.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 29, 2009.

*267 Fisher & Lawrence and Joshua L. Fisher, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, ROTHENBERG, and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208, 218 (Fla.2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

14 So.3d 266 (2009)

No. 3D09-1457.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 29, 2009.

*267 Fisher & Lawrence and Joshua L. Fisher, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, ROTHENBERG, and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208, 218 (Fla.2006).

DAIUJUST v. State, 14 So. 3d 266, 2009 WL 2243848 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

14 So. 3d 266 (DAIUJUST v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

944 So. 2d 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)

14 So. 3d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)