Daisy M. Graves v. Office of Personnel Management

11 F.3d 1073, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35974, 1993 WL 460876
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 1993
Docket93-3325
StatusUnpublished

This text of 11 F.3d 1073 (Daisy M. Graves v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daisy M. Graves v. Office of Personnel Management, 11 F.3d 1073, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35974, 1993 WL 460876 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

Opinion

11 F.3d 1073

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Daisy M. GRAVES, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 93-3325.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1993.

Before NEWMAN, ARCHER, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

Daisy M. Graves appeals from the initial decision of an Administrative Judge (AJ) of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), Docket No. NY831E920433-I-1 (Oct. 8, 1992), affirming the Office of Personnel Management's denial of her application for disability retirement under the Civil Service Retirement System, 5 U.S.C. Secs. 8331, 8337. The decision of the AJ became the final decision of the MSPB on March 1, 1993, when the MSPB denied Ms. Graves's petition for review.

Ms. Graves argues in her appeal to this court that the medical evidence demonstrates that she is entitled to disability retirement. However, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. Sec. 8347(c) & (d) and Lindahl v. OPM, 470 U.S. 768, 791 (1985), this court is without jurisdiction to review the factual underpinnings of the MSPB's disability retirement determination. See Smith v. OPM, 784 F.2d 397, 400 (Fed.Cir.1986); Hammond v. OPM, 784 F.2d 392, 393 (Fed.Cir.1986); McEachern v. OPM, 776 F.2d 1539, 1542-43 (Fed.Cir.1985); Lee v. OPM, 762 F.2d 987, 988 (Fed.Cir.1985). Accordingly the appeal must be and is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
470 U.S. 768 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Joseph M. Lee v. Office of Personnel Management
762 F.2d 987 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Olive S. McEachern v. Office of Personnel Management
776 F.2d 1539 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Robert D. Hammond v. Office of Personnel Management
784 F.2d 392 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Larry M. Smith v. Office of Personnel Management
784 F.2d 397 (Federal Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F.3d 1073, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35974, 1993 WL 460876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daisy-m-graves-v-office-of-personnel-management-cafc-1993.