Dais v. Small & Margolin
932 F.2d 959, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9480, 1991 WL 70704
Opinion
932 F.2d 959
Dais (Thaddeus)
v.
Small & Margolin, Small (Lewis), Lipshutz (Robert M.),
Guarino (Angelo A., Honorable), Ehrlich (Charles), Castille
(Ronald D.), Bradley (Edward F.), Casey (Robert P.), Martin
(Frank), Fenney (Robert), Doyle (Thomas), Williams (Willie),
Goode (W. Wilson), City of Philadelphia
NO. 90-1100
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
APR 03, 1991
Appeal From: E.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dais v. Small & Margolin, 932 F.2d 959, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9480, 1991 WL 70704 (3d Cir. 1991).
932 F.2d 959 (Dais v. Small & Margolin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.