Dais v. Small & Margolin

932 F.2d 959, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9480, 1991 WL 70704
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 3, 1991·No. 90-1100·Published

Opinion

932 F.2d 959

Dais (Thaddeus)
v.
Small & Margolin, Small (Lewis), Lipshutz (Robert M.),
Guarino (Angelo A., Honorable), Ehrlich (Charles), Castille
(Ronald D.), Bradley (Edward F.), Casey (Robert P.), Martin
(Frank), Fenney (Robert), Doyle (Thomas), Williams (Willie),
Goode (W. Wilson), City of Philadelphia

NO. 90-1100

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

APR 03, 1991

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dais v. Small & Margolin, 932 F.2d 959, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9480, 1991 WL 70704 (3d Cir. 1991).

932 F.2d 959 (Dais v. Small & Margolin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.