Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Cobbs

8 S.W.3d 191, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2345
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 7, 1999
DocketNo. ED 75607
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 S.W.3d 191 (Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Cobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Cobbs, 8 S.W.3d 191, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2345 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an interpleader action, appellant, Gordon Neilson, claims that the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis erred in finding that he did not establish an attorney/client relationship [192]*192with the respondent, Tarron Cobbs. We affirm.1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neilson v. McCloskey
186 S.W.3d 285 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 S.W.3d 191, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dairyland-insurance-co-v-cobbs-moctapp-1999.