Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Cobbs
This text of 8 S.W.3d 191 (Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Cobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
In this appeal from an interpleader action, appellant, Gordon Neilson, claims that the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis erred in finding that he did not establish an attorney/client relationship [192]*192with the respondent, Tarron Cobbs. We affirm.1
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 S.W.3d 191, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dairyland-insurance-co-v-cobbs-moctapp-1999.