Daiquiri Hill v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Dba AT&T Texas
This text of Daiquiri Hill v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Dba AT&T Texas (Daiquiri Hill v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Dba AT&T Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 18, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00836-CV ——————————— DAIQUIRI HILL, Appellant V. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY DBA AT&T TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 269th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2017-42352
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Daiquiri Hill, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041; Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in
Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has
not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal,
appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Landau.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daiquiri Hill v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Dba AT&T Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daiquiri-hill-v-southwestern-bell-telephone-company-dba-att-texas-texapp-2019.