Daines v. Tarabusi

250 Mich. 217
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 1930
DocketDocket Nos. 84, 85, Calendar Nos. 34,770, 34,771
StatusPublished

This text of 250 Mich. 217 (Daines v. Tarabusi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daines v. Tarabusi, 250 Mich. 217 (Mich. 1930).

Opinion

Clark, J.

The declaration in each of these cases is on a bond. At the conclusion of proof, plaintiffs had shown damage in excess of the amount named in the ad damnum clause. They asked and were given leave to amend.

Plaintiffs had judgment in each case here reviewed on error.

[218]*218The sole contention is that the judgment may not exceed the amount named in the ad damnum clause. True, hut the court permitted amendment of the clause as he had right to do. 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12478; Zeilman v. Fry, 213 Mich. 504; Gates v. Beebe, 170 Mich. 107.

Affirmed.

Wiest, C. J., and Butzel, McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gates v. Beebe
135 N.W. 934 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Zeilman v. Fry
182 N.W. 41 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 Mich. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daines-v-tarabusi-mich-1930.