Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Wesco Distribution, Inc.
763 N.W.2d 918
Opinion
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
WESCO DISTRIBUTION, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and
High Voltage Maintenance Corporation, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Wesco Distribution, Inc., 763 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. 2009).
763 N.W.2d 918 (Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Wesco Distribution, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Golden
763 N.W.2d 918 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)