Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Wesco Distribution, Inc.
This text of 763 N.W.2d 918 (Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Wesco Distribution, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
WESCO DISTRIBUTION, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and
High Voltage Maintenance Corporation, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
763 N.W.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daimlerchrysler-corporation-v-wesco-distribution-inc-mich-2009.