DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States

29 Ct. Int'l Trade 1226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 350 F. Supp. 2d 1339
United States Court of International Trade·Decided September 26, 2005·No. Court No. 99-00668·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

RESTANT, Chief Judge:

The merchandise at issue is identical in all material respects to that in DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States, 361 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2004), wherein defendant’s classification failed.

The parties do not request a new trial. Accordingly, the court is bound by precedent, and judgment is entered for plaintiff requiring duty free treatment under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) item 9802.00.80 for the U.S. made truck parts painted and assembled-in Mexico, re-entered into the United States on May 5, 1993, under entry numbers 228-0107083-4 and 228-0107085-9.

Defendant shall refund the duties erroneously collected together with interest as provided by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States, 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 1226 (cit 2005).

29 Ct. Int'l Trade 1226 (DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United States
361 F.3d 1378 (Federal Circuit, 2004)