Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. State Tax Com'n

738 N.W.2d 707
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 21, 2007
Docket133394
StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.W.2d 707 (Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. State Tax Com'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. State Tax Com'n, 738 N.W.2d 707 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

738 N.W.2d 707 (2007)

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
STATE TAX COMMISSION and Department of Environmental Quality, Respondents-Appellees, and
City of Auburn Hills, Respondent-Appellant.
Ford Motor Company, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
State Tax Commission and Department of Environmental Quality, Respondents-Appellees, and
City of Dearborn, Intervening Respondent-Appellant.
Ford Motor Company, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
State Tax Commission and Department of Environmental Quality, Respondents-Appellants, and
City of Dearborn, Intervening Respondent-Appellee.
Detroit Diesel Corporation, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
v.
State Tax Commission and Department of Environmental Quality, Respondents-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, and
Charter Township of Redford, Intervening Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellee.
Ford Motor Company, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
State Tax Commission and Department of Environmental Quality, Respondents-Appellants.
Daimlerchrysler Corporation, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
State Tax Commission and Department of Environmental Quality, Respondents-Appellants, and
Township of Sylvan, Respondent-Appellee.
Daimlerchrysler Corporation, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
State Tax Commission and Department of Environmental Quality, Respondents-Appellants, and
City of Auburn Hills, Respondent-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 133394, 133396, 133400-133406. COA Nos. 262487, 262488, 262500, 263188, 264154, 265686, 267565.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 21, 2007.

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the January 30, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 N.W.2d 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daimlerchrysler-corp-v-state-tax-comn-mich-2007.