Daimler Chrysler Corporation v. Tina and Darrin Wagner

838 N.E.2d 450, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 1106, 2005 WL 3304136
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 2005
Docket66S03-0512-CV-625
StatusPublished

This text of 838 N.E.2d 450 (Daimler Chrysler Corporation v. Tina and Darrin Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daimler Chrysler Corporation v. Tina and Darrin Wagner, 838 N.E.2d 450, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 1106, 2005 WL 3304136 (Ind. 2005).

Opinion

DICKSON, Justice.

This appeal presents the same procedural issue that we address today in Daimler Chrysler Corporation v. Yaeger, 838 N.E.2d 449 (Ind.2005). As in Yaeger, the defendants sought to appeal from the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss and compel arbitration, but failed to seek trial court certification authorizing it to appeal from the interlocutory order as required by Indiana Appellate Rule 14(B). The plaintiffs, Tina Wagner and Darrin Wagner, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, asserting failure to comply with Rule 14(B), but the Court of Appeals, in a memorandum decision, denied the motion and considered the appeal, expressly following the reasoning of the majority in the Court of Appeals opinion in Yaeger. In accord with our opinion issued today in Yaeger, we now grant transfer and dismiss this appeal.

This appeal is dismissed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court.

SHEPARD, C.J., and SULLIVAN, BOEHM, and RUCKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. Yaeger
838 N.E.2d 449 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 N.E.2d 450, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 1106, 2005 WL 3304136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daimler-chrysler-corporation-v-tina-and-darrin-wagner-ind-2005.