Daily v. Daily

514 S.W.3d 61, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 189, 2017 WL 1056208

• Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
• Decided: March 21, 2017
• Docket: No. ED 104218
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angelique M. Daily appeals from the trial court’s Memorandum, Order and Amended Judgment dissolving her marriage to James E. Daily, IV. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994); Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc. 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).