Daily States Pub. Co. v. White

118 So. 839, 9 La. App. 70, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 559
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 15, 1928·No. No. 10,405·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

The basis of this appeal is the alleged error of the trial Judge in refusing a new trial.

A new trial was asked for upon the ground that counsel erroneously entered a notice of trial in his diary and, upon the further ground, that at the time of the trial, counsel was suffering from a severe cold which had involved his bronchial tubes. It is not claimed that any appearance or request for continuance was made in counsel’s behalf nor any written communication addressed to the Court.

The suit is on open account, which according to the evidence, was admitted to be due by defendant.

The refusal of a new trial under the circumstances, was well within the discretion of the trial Judge, with which we will not interfere. La. Digest, Vol. 5, page 534, Verbo New Trial.

Damages are asked for frivolous aippeal which we think should be allowed. The judgment appealed from will be affirmed with ten per cent damages for frivolous appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daily States Pub. Co. v. White, 118 So. 839, 9 La. App. 70, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 559 (La. Ct. App. 1928).

118 So. 839 (Daily States Pub. Co. v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hebert v. State Farm Ins. Co.
588 So. 2d 1150 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Maison Blanche Co. v. Mefsut
181 So. 646 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)
Pfeifer v. Bacharach
121 So. 196 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)