Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v. Global Liberty Ins.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2017
Docket2017 NYSlipOp 51710(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v. Global Liberty Ins. (Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v. Global Liberty Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v. Global Liberty Ins., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion



Daily Medical Equipment Distribution Center, Inc., as Assignee of Mendoza, Juan, Appellant,

against

Global Liberty Insurance, Respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. (Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered May 21, 2014. The order held defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in abeyance pending an application to the Workers' Compensation Board to determine the parties' rights under the Workers' Compensation Law.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon plaintiff's assignor's alleged eligibility for workers' compensation benefits. The Civil Court held the motion in abeyance pending an application to the Workers' Compensation Board to determine the parties' rights under the Workers' Compensation Law. Plaintiff appeals.

The order appealed from did not decide defendant's motion but instead, as noted, held the motion in abeyance pending a determination by the Workers' Compensation Board as to whether plaintiff's assignor had been acting in the course of his employment at the time of the accident and whether, therefore, workers' compensation benefits might be available (see O'Rourke v Long, [*2]41 NY2d 219 [1976]). Thus, the order is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Acunto v Stewart Ave. Gardens, LLC, 26 AD3d 305 [2006]) and, under the circumstances, we decline to grant leave to appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 08, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acunto v. Stewart Avenue Gardens, LLC
26 A.D.3d 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v. Global Liberty Ins., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daily-med-equip-distrib-ctr-inc-v-global-liberty-ins-nyappterm-2017.