Dailey's Adm'r v. Baker

Richmond County Circuit Court

Dailey's Adm'r v. Baker

18 Va. Cir. 469, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 22

CourtRichmond County Circuit Court

DecidedFebruary 16, 1990

DocketCase No. LR-2687-3

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Va. Cir. 469 (Dailey's Adm'r v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Richmond County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dailey's Adm'r v. Baker, 18 Va. Cir. 469, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 22 (Va. Super. Ct. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE T. J. MARROW

After the pretrial conference of February 8th, I was to decide whether the economist witness could adjust for income taxes on his earnings estimates or whether defendant could cross-examine or argue this issue. I have concluded that this is an inappropriate and irrelevant issue in estimating the decedent’s earning capacity and should not be entertained as an issue in the trial of this case. See Norfolk Southern v. Rayburn, 213 Va. 812 (1973); Hoge v. Anderson, 200 Va. 364 (1958).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE T. J. MARROW

After the pretrial conference of February 8th, I was to decide whether the economist witness could adjust for income taxes on his earnings estimates or whether defendant could cross-examine or argue this issue. I have concluded that this is an inappropriate and irrelevant issue in estimating the decedent’s earning capacity and should not be entertained as an issue in the trial of this case. See Norfolk Southern v. Rayburn, 213 Va. 812 (1973); Hoge v. Anderson, 200 Va. 364 (1958).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Va. Cir. 469, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daileys-admr-v-baker-vaccrichmondcty-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack