Dailey v. State

285 S.W.2d 733, 162 Tex. Crim. 387, 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1660
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 23, 1955·No. 27842·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

, The offense is felony theft; the punishment, 3 years.,

Our State’s Attorney confesses error. The verdict was returned by a jury consisting of only eleven jurors. A verdict of less than twelve jurors will not support a valid judgment. , Clark v. St,ate, Tex.Cr. App., 276 S.W.2d 819, and cases there cited.

Appellant urges,, however, that we write on the question of former jeopardy which she contends' was raised. Though the record is far from Complete on the question, we do observe that there was no final judgment in the prior case because notice of appeal was given before the court dismissed the case. Only a final judgment will support a plea of former conviction. Ramirez v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 256,-179 S.W. 2d 976.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dailey v. State, 285 S.W.2d 733, 162 Tex. Crim. 387, 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1660 (Tex. 1955).

285 S.W.2d 733 (Dailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuellar v. State
957 S.W.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Hanley v. State
909 S.W.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Ex Parte Little
887 S.W.2d 62 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Ex parte Carter
837 S.W.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Marr v. State
689 S.W.2d 290 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)