Dailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dailey v. State

1912 OK CR 288, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 715, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 18, 1912

DocketNo. A-984.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 288 (Dailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dailey v. State, 1912 OK CR 288, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 715, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information which charged the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and on September 19, 1910, was sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. An examination of the record discloses the fact that there is no merit in this appeal. The verdict, judgment, and sentence should be sustained upon the testimony of the defendant alone. The judgment of the county court of Rogers county is therefore affirmed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information which charged the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and on September 19, 1910, was sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. An examination of the record discloses the fact that there is no merit in this appeal. The verdict, judgment, and sentence should be sustained upon the testimony of the defendant alone. The judgment of the county court of Rogers county is therefore affirmed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 288, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 715, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dailey-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.