Dailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dailey v. State

1912 OK CR 288, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 715, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 18, 1912·No. No. A-984.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information which charged the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and on September 19, 1910, was sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. An examination of the record discloses the fact that there is no merit in this appeal. The verdict, judgment, and sentence should be sustained upon the testimony of the defendant alone. The judgment of the county court of Rogers county is therefore affirmed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information which charged the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and on September 19, 1910, was sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. An examination of the record discloses the fact that there is no merit in this appeal. The verdict, judgment, and sentence should be sustained upon the testimony of the defendant alone. The judgment of the county court of Rogers county is therefore affirmed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Dailey v. State, 1912 OK CR 288, 122 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 715, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 288 (Dailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.