Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Dailey v. State

Dailey v. State

610 So. 2d 738, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 111, 1993 WL 5347
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 13, 1993
DocketNo. 91-02142
StatusPublished

This text of 610 So. 2d 738 (Dailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dailey v. State, 610 So. 2d 738, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 111, 1993 WL 5347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

Dailey has challenged his habitual offender sentence on several grounds, none of which has merit. See Massey v. State, 609 So.2d 598 (Fla.1992); Baxter v. State, 599 So.2d 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We do, however, remand for the trial court to strike special condition of probation number six, which was inappropriately imposed without oral pronouncement. Zachary v. State, 559 So.2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). All costs except those mandated by sections 960.20 and 943.25(3),. Florida Statutes, are stricken.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LUTEN, CLAIRE K., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massey v. State
609 So. 2d 598 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Baxter v. State
599 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Zachary v. State
559 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 738, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 111, 1993 WL 5347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dailey-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.