Dailey v. Resco Products of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dailey v. Resco Products of Missouri

881 S.W.2d 256, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330, 1994 WL 424650

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 1994·No. No. 65761·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Dailey v. Resco Products of Missouri, 881 S.W.2d 256, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330, 1994 WL 424650 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

881 S.W.2d 256 (Dailey v. Resco Products of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.