Dailey v. Lew

670 F. App'x 142
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1464
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 670 F. App'x 142 (Dailey v. Lew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dailey v. Lew, 670 F. App'x 142 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mitzi E. Dailey appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motions to dismiss her civil claims against them, including her race and sex and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dai-ley’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s order granting Appellee Getz’s motion for leave to file a separate brief and affirm the district court’s order. See Dailey v. Lew, No. 1:15-cv-02527-GLR, 2016 WL 1558150 (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the [143]*143facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F. App'x 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dailey-v-lew-ca4-2016.