Dailey v. Dailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dailey v. Dailey

474 S.W.3d 591, 2015 WL 5249341, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 891

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 8, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101816

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 474 S.W.3d 591 (Dailey v. Dailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dailey v. Dailey, 474 S.W.3d 591, 2015 WL 5249341, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 891 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■Alicia Dailey (“Mother”) .appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her marriage to Eric Dailey.

We have reviewed Mother’s brief and the record on . appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles [592]*592of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■Alicia Dailey (“Mother”) .appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her marriage to Eric Dailey.

We have reviewed Mother’s brief and the record on . appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles [592]*592of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 S.W.3d 591, 2015 WL 5249341, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dailey-v-dailey-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack