Dailey v. Dailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dailey v. Dailey

474 S.W.3d 591, 2015 WL 5249341, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 891

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. No. ED 101816·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■Alicia Dailey (“Mother”) .appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her marriage to Eric Dailey.

We have reviewed Mother’s brief and the record on . appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles [592] of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■Alicia Dailey (“Mother”) .appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her marriage to Eric Dailey.

We have reviewed Mother’s brief and the record on . appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles [592] of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Dailey v. Dailey, 474 S.W.3d 591, 2015 WL 5249341, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 891 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

474 S.W.3d 591 (Dailey v. Dailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related