Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 915, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 450

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedDecember 5, 2000

DocketSC 16435

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 763 A.2d 1037 (Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance, 763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 915, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 450 (Colo. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 465 (AC 19529), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly granted the defendant’s motion in limine preventing the plaintiff from introducing his income tax returns?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 465 (AC 19529), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly granted the defendant’s motion in limine preventing the plaintiff from introducing his income tax returns?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 915, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daigle-v-metropolitan-property-casualty-insurance-conn-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack