Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 915, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 450
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 465 (AC 19529), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly granted the defendant’s motion in limine preventing the plaintiff from introducing his income tax returns?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance, 763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 915, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 450 (Colo. 2000).
763 A.2d 1037 (Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
777 A.2d 681 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)