Daigle v. Maine Medical

First Circuit

Daigle v. Maine Medical

19 F.3d 7, 1994 WL 47130

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 1994

Docket93-1528

StatusUnpublished

This text of 19 F.3d 7 (Daigle v. Maine Medical) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daigle v. Maine Medical, 19 F.3d 7, 1994 WL 47130 (1st Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

19 F.3d 7

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Dawn DAIGLE, Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
MAINE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Defendant, Appellant.

No. 93-1528.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

January 31, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire

Christine M. Rockefeller, with whom Paul R. Cox and Burns, Bryant, Hinchey, Cox & Schulte, P.A. were on brief, for plaintiff.

Gerald F. Petruccelli, with whom Mary Mitchell Friedman and Petruccelli & Martin were on brief, for defendant.

D.N.H.

DISMISSED.

Before Selya, Circuit Judge, Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge, and Cyr, Circuit Judge.

Per Curiam.

Having today decided the merits of plaintiff's appeal, see Daigle v. Maine Medical Center, Inc., No. 93-1470 (1st Cir. Jan., 1994), it is unnecessary to decide this cross-appeal. We, therefore, dismiss it.

Appeal dismissed. No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI