Dahlonega Gold Mining Co. v. Purdy
68 Ga. 296
This text of 68 Ga. 296 (Dahlonega Gold Mining Co. v. Purdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dahlonega Gold Mining Co. v. Purdy, 68 Ga. 296 (Ga. 1881).
Opinion
1. Where a judgment of the superior court has been affirmed by this court, its legality becomes res adjudicata, and it cannot be attacked by affidavit of illegality for errors which were or could have been excepted to in the bill of exceptions.
2. No sufficient legal reason for excepting appearing in this case, ten per cent, damages are awarded against plaintiff in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brewer v. Settle
86 S.E. 545 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 Ga. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dahlonega-gold-mining-co-v-purdy-ga-1881.