Dahlonega Gold Mining Co. v. Purdy

68 Ga. 296
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

1. Where a judgment of the superior court has been affirmed by this court, its legality becomes res adjudicata, and it cannot be attacked by affidavit of illegality for errors which were or could have been excepted to in the bill of exceptions.

2. No sufficient legal reason for excepting appearing in this case, ten per cent, damages are awarded against plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dahlonega Gold Mining Co. v. Purdy, 68 Ga. 296 (Ga. 1881).

68 Ga. 296 (Dahlonega Gold Mining Co. v. Purdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brewer v. Settle
86 S.E. 545 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)