Dahlke v. Frankel

267 A.D.2d 54, 699 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12668
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered November 16, 1998, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs’ proposed amendment to their complaint to include, under their previously asserted cause of action for lack of informed consent, a claim for punitive damages, was not, given the deposition testimony of plaintiff and defendant doctor, plainly without merit and, accordingly, amendment of the complaint to include the claim for punitive damages was properly permitted (see, Atherton v 21 E. 92nd St. Corp., 149 AD2d 354, 356; Hawkins v Genesee Place Corp., 139 AD2d 433). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dahlke v. Frankel, 267 A.D.2d 54, 699 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 54 (Dahlke v. Frankel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. LaFontaine-Rish Medical Associates
33 A.D.3d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Paretta v. Medical Offices for Human Reproduction
195 Misc. 2d 568 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)