Dahlia v. Rodriguez
704 F.3d 1043, 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1576, 2012 WL 6184028, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 2012
DocketNo. 10-55978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 704 F.3d 1043 (Dahlia v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dahlia v. Rodriguez, 704 F.3d 1043, 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1576, 2012 WL 6184028, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25297 (9th Cir. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire District
955 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (E.D. California, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
704 F.3d 1043, 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1576, 2012 WL 6184028, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dahlia-v-rodriguez-ca9-2012.