Dahlia v. Rodriguez

704 F.3d 1043, 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1576, 2012 WL 6184028, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25297
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 11, 2012·No. No. 10-55978·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dahlia v. Rodriguez, 704 F.3d 1043, 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1576, 2012 WL 6184028, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25297 (9th Cir. 2012).

704 F.3d 1043 (Dahlia v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire District
955 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (E.D. California, 2013)