Dahlberg v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Dahlberg v. Johnson

137 N.W. 1115, 119 Minn. 534, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 524

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 25, 1912

DocketNos. 17,932—(48)

StatusPublished

This text of 137 N.W. 1115 (Dahlberg v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dahlberg v. Johnson, 137 N.W. 1115, 119 Minn. 534, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 524 (Mich. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Pek Cubiam.

Appeal from a judgment in an action to determine boundary lines to land. The only question presented by the record is whether the court’s findings of fact sustain its conclusions of law and judgment. We hold, upon a consideration of the record, that the conclusion of law and judgment are so clearly sustained by the facts found as to render any discussion of the question unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pek Cubiam.

Appeal from a judgment in an action to determine boundary lines to land. The only question presented by the record is whether the court’s findings of fact sustain its conclusions of law and judgment. We hold, upon a consideration of the record, that the conclusion of law and judgment are so clearly sustained by the facts found as to render any discussion of the question unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 N.W. 1115, 119 Minn. 534, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dahlberg-v-johnson-minn-1912.