Dahl v. State
This text of 139 So. 3d 944 (Dahl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The patient appeals from the trial court’s order granting the treatment center’s petition to impose involuntary psychotropic treatment upon the patient pursuant to section 916.107(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2013). The patient asserts the trial court erred in entering the order without competent, substantial evidence showing that he received, in writing, an individualized treatment plan which he had an opportunity to assist in preparing as required by section 916.107(2)(d), Florida [945]*945Statutes (2013). Because the patient’s argument was not preserved below, we affirm the trial court’s order.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 So. 3d 944, 2014 WL 2197622, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dahl-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.