Dahl v. Levenberg
172 A.D. 919, 157 N.Y.S. 14
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Mo final judgment has been entered, but if, in view of the stipulation of the parties, the order may be deemed such, it should be reversed, without costs, and the demurrer sustained, with leave to plead over on payment of costs. There should be united as plaintiffs all the owners of the mortgage, including the personal representatives of any who may have died. If the consent of any one of such persons cannot be obtained he may be made a defendant, “ the reason therefor being stated in the complaint.”
See Code Civ. Proc. § 448.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dahl v. Levenberg, 172 A.D. 919, 157 N.Y.S. 14 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
172 A.D. 919 (Dahl v. Levenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
418 Trading Corp. v. Moon Realty Corp.
285 A.D. 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Frank v. Jaffa
181 Misc. 517 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Horbal v. St. John's Greek Catholic Church
244 N.W. 493 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)
Great Neck Improvement Corp. v. Shoreward Realty Corp.
143 Misc. 792 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)