Dahl v. Commissioner

526 F.2d 552, 36 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 75
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1975
DocketNo. 74-3461
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 526 F.2d 552 (Dahl v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dahl v. Commissioner, 526 F.2d 552, 36 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 75 (9th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION

Before BROWNING and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and LUCAS,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In this review of a Tax*Court decision upholding a deficiency assessed under the imputed interest provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 483, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Tax Court opinion below. Harold B. & Jean C. Dahl, 43 P—H Tax Ct.Mem. 755 (1974). The Dahls were not entitled to a jury trial before the Tax Court. See Olshausen v. C. I. R., 273 F.2d 23, 28 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 820, 80 S.Ct. 1256, 4 L.Ed.2d 1517 (1960).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conklin v. Commissioner
1981 T.C. Memo. 471 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 F.2d 552, 36 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dahl-v-commissioner-ca9-1975.