Dahir (Shane) Vs. State
This text of Dahir (Shane) Vs. State (Dahir (Shane) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SHANE MICHAEL DAHIR, No. 81089 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent. P•IAY 1 5 2020 EMMEN A. BROWN CLERK X SUPREME COURT EY FIEPU‘t I CL lEl ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no decision had been made on the motion when appellant filed his appeal on April 23, 2020.1 Thus, this appeal is premature. See NRS 177.015(3) (stating that a defendant only may appeal from a final judgment or verdict). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
,Al•ks.-0 t4 , J. J Stiglich 6 Silver
lA hearing is scheduled for June 1, 2020. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A allatia a -I Vogl cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Shane Michael Dahir Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A 2 •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dahir (Shane) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dahir-shane-vs-state-nev-2020.