Dahir (Shane) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SHANE MICHAEL DAHIR, No. 81089 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

FILE

Respondent. P•IAY 1 5 2020 EMMEN A. BROWN CLERK X SUPREME COURT EY

FIEPU‘t

I CL lEl

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no decision had been made on the motion when appellant filed his appeal on April 23, 2020.1 Thus, this appeal is premature. See NRS 177.015(3) (stating that a defendant only may appeal from a final judgment or verdict). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

,Al•ks.-0

t4 , J. J Stiglich 6 Silver

lA hearing is scheduled for June 1, 2020.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A allatia a -I Vogl cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Shane Michael Dahir Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I 947A 2 •