Daher Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Daher Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1021, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1933

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 18, 1968

DocketNo. P68/154; protest 67/11907 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1021 (Daher Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daher Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1021, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1933 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of containers of tinplate, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and not containing electrical heating elements, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Fabius & Co., Inc., and Daher Company, Inc. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 305, C.D. 2595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of containers of tinplate, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and not containing electrical heating elements, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Fabius & Co., Inc., and Daher Company, Inc. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 305, C.D. 2595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 1021, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daher-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack