D'Agostino v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

D'Agostino v. Gomez

16 A.D.2d 802

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 802 (D'Agostino v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D'Agostino v. Gomez, 16 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage, defendant Gomez appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 22, 1961, which: (1) granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to reargue and reconsider the said defendant’s motion, made pursuant to section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution; (2) vacated and set aside the prior order of said court, dated May 29, 1959, dismissing the action; (3) denied said defendant’s original motion to dismiss; and (4) upon plaintiffs’ consents, transferred the case to the City Court of the City of New York. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage, defendant Gomez appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 22, 1961, which: (1) granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to reargue and reconsider the said defendant’s motion, made pursuant to section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution; (2) vacated and set aside the prior order of said court, dated May 29, 1959, dismissing the action; (3) denied said defendant’s original motion to dismiss; and (4) upon plaintiffs’ consents, transferred the case to the City Court of the City of New York. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dagostino-v-gomez-nyappdiv-1962.