D'Agostino v. D'Agostino

173 Misc. 312
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 6, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 Misc. 312 (D'Agostino v. D'Agostino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D'Agostino v. D'Agostino, 173 Misc. 312 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1940).

Opinion

Froessel, J.

In an action to annul a marriage for fraudulently concealing pregnancy, plaintiff husband seeks a blood grouping test. Defendant opposes because plaintiff has not complied with the order of this court dated December 1, 1939, awarding temporary alimony and counsel fee. Section 306-a of the Civil Practice Act provides that “ wherever it shall be relevant to the prosecution [313]*313* * * of an action ” the court “ shall direct ” such test. Under the circumstances the motion will be granted and the defendant relegated to her other remedies to enforce the provisions of the order. The court will name a physician in the order to be entered hereon, which order shall provide that his fee shall be paid by the plaintiff in advance. Said physician shall submit a report of his findings to counsel for both sides. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shanks v. State
45 A.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 Misc. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dagostino-v-dagostino-nysupct-1940.