Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales , Attorney General, Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

404 F.3d 1105
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2005·No. 03-70931·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

404 F.3d 1105

Dagoberto LARA-TORRES; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners,
v.
Alberto GONZALES*, Attorney General, Respondent.
Dagoberto Lara-Torres; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners,
v.
Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondent.
Dagoberto Lara-Torres; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners,
v.
Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72329.

No. 03-70931.

No. 03-70932.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2004.

Filed September 8, 2004.

Amended April 21, 2005.

Marc Van Der Hout, Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioners.

Russell J.E. Verby, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Agency Nos. Avc-yes-wob, Aib-cut-sgb.

Before WALLACE, McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.**

ORDER

The majority opinion filed September 8, 2004, slip op. 12991, and appearing at 383 F.3d 968 (9th Cir.2004), is hereby amended as follows:

1. Page 974, at end of second full paragraph, after citation to Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 900-01, insert: "While this temporal distinction may not always be significant, in this case, Pineda's allegedly ineffective assistance did not undermine the fairness of the removal proceedings in part because it was given well before the prospect of a hearing materialized."

2. Page 975, at end of first paragraph: change "removed from the actual process itself" to "which does not undermine the fairness of the actual process itself"

With these amendments, Judge McKeown has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Wallace and Moskowitz have so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

Notes:

*

Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2)

**

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales , Attorney General, Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2005).

404 F.3d 1105 (Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales , Attorney General, Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Dagoberto Lara-Torres Erika Lara-Perez v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres Diaz v. Blanche
Ninth Circuit, 2026
Maldonado v. Bondi
Ninth Circuit, 2025
Rodriguez v. Garland
Ninth Circuit, 2024
Rocha-Saldana v. Garland
Ninth Circuit, 2024
Regalado Gomez v. Garland
Ninth Circuit, 2023
Juan Hernandez-Ortiz v. Merrick Garland
32 F.4th 794 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)
Hui Mu v. William Barr
936 F.3d 929 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Casteneda-Rivera v. Holder
423 F. App'x 729 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Escobedo Gomez v. Holder
Ninth Circuit, 2010
Blanco v. Mukasey
Ninth Circuit, 2008
Ghahremani v. Gonzales
Ninth Circuit, 2007
Padilla Padilla v. Gonzales
Ninth Circuit, 2006
Yeghiazaryan v. Gonzales
Ninth Circuit, 2006