Dago Bruce Hale v. State of Florida
This text of Dago Bruce Hale v. State of Florida (Dago Bruce Hale v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-1534 _____________________________
DAGO BRUCE HALE,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
October 15, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James, 810 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (observing that whether a motion to disqualify was timely filed generally will involve a factual determination, and thus, is reviewed to determine whether competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s ruling).
ROBERTS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Anne M. Rush, Alachua, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dago Bruce Hale v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dago-bruce-hale-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.