Dagley v. City of Denison, TX

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40900 Summary Calendar __________________

MYRON C. DAGLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF DENISON, TEXAS, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees,

JOHN DOES 1-15; JANE DOES, 1-5,

Defendants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-55 - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Myron C. Dagley challenges the grant of summary judgment for

the defendants-appellees. He does not challenge the district

court's imposition of sanction. Therefore, that issue is deemed

abandoned on appeal. See Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th

Cir. 1994).

We have carefully reviewed the appellate arguments and the

record. For essentially the same reasons upon which the district

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40900 -2-

court relied, see Dagley v. Lovell, No. 4:95cv55 (E.D. Tex. Oct.

13, 1995), we conclude that the district court did not err in

granting summary judgment for the defendants-appellees.

Dagley's argument concerning alleged judicial bias against

him by the district court is without merit. See Liteky v. United

States, 114 S. Ct. 1147, 1157-58 (1994).

Dagley's appeal is without arguable merit and thus

frivolous. Because it is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

DISMISSED.