Dagher v. Saudi
This text of Dagher v. Saudi (Dagher v. Saudi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOUAD N. DAGHER; BISHARAT ENTERPRISES INC.; ALFRED BUCZKOWSKI; ESEQUIEL DELAGADO; MAHWASH FARZANEH; NASSER EL- RADI; G.G.&R. PETROLEUM INC.; H.J.F. INC.; KALECO CO.; CARLOS MARQUEZ; SAMI MERHI, EDGARDO R. PARUNGAO; RON ABEL SERV. CENTER, INC.; GULLERMO RAMIREZ; JERRY’S SHELL SERV. CENTER, INC.; LEOPOLOO RAMIREZ; NAZAR No. 02-56509 SHEIBAINI; SITARA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; TINSEL ENTERPRISES D.C. No. CV-99-06114-GHK INC.; QUANG TRUONG; STEVEN RAY VEZERIAN; LOS FELIZ SHELL, INC.; Central District NASSIM HANNA, of California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Los Angeles v. ORDER SAUDI REFINING INC., (SRI); TEXACO INC.; SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, and MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC; EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC; EQUIVA TRADING COMPANY; EQUIVA SERVICES LLC, Defendants.
17711 17712 DAGHER v. SAUDI REFINING INC. On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed October 24, 2006
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the Supreme Court judgment, we affirm the dis- trict court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dagher v. Saudi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dagher-v-saudi-ca9-2006.