Daggs v. Frazer

D. Iowa

Daggs v. Frazer

6 F. Cas. 1112

DecidedJanuary 15, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 6 F. Cas. 1112 (Daggs v. Frazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daggs v. Frazer, 6 F. Cas. 1112 (iad 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

BY

THE COURT.

The averments in the declaration are not sufficient to support the action. Trover will not- lie in this state to recover the value of slaves. See opinion of Coulter, J., 2 Am. Law J. (N. S.) 41 [Kauffman v. Oliver, 10 Pa. St. 514], Demurrer sustained.

[1114]*1114The plaintiff then asked leave to withdraw his joinder in demurrer, and amend his declaration in any manner not inconsistent with the writ, which was granted, and the cause continued at the costs of the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY

THE COURT.

The averments in the declaration are not sufficient to support the action. Trover will not- lie in this state to recover the value of slaves. See opinion of Coulter, J., 2 Am. Law J. (N. S.) 41 [Kauffman v. Oliver, 10 Pa. St. 514], Demurrer sustained.

[1114]*1114The plaintiff then asked leave to withdraw his joinder in demurrer, and amend his declaration in any manner not inconsistent with the writ, which was granted, and the cause continued at the costs of the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 F. Cas. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daggs-v-frazer-iad-1849.