Daggs v. Elliott

1911 OK 86, 114 P. 698, 28 Okla. 452, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 124
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 21, 1911
Docket975
StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK 86 (Daggs v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daggs v. Elliott, 1911 OK 86, 114 P. 698, 28 Okla. 452, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 124 (Okla. 1911).

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

On July 23, 1909, the plaintiff in error filed petition in error and case-made in this court.' On January 9, 1911, the defendant in error filed a motion, which shows service upon the attorney for the plaintiff in error, asking that the appeal. be dismissed on account of plaintiff in error’s failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), which requires him to prepare and serve his brief upon the defendant in error within 40 days from the time of filing his petition in this court. Neither has this been done, nor has any response been made to said motion. The facts in this case are substantially the same as in Leavitt et al. v. Commercial National Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 Pac. 71.

The appeal is dismissed.

All 'the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leavitt v. Commercial Nat. Bank
1910 OK 140 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1911 OK 86, 114 P. 698, 28 Okla. 452, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daggs-v-elliott-okla-1911.