Daggett v. Vanderslice
This text of 13 P. 402 (Daggett v. Vanderslice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The action was instituted to recover from Vanderslice, the defendant, the value of some silverware left with him for safekeeping. Judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff then moved for a new trial, which was granted, and from the order made therein this appeal is prosecuted. We perceive no such abuse of the discretion vested in the trial court as would warrant a reversal of the order made in the premises, and in our opinion it should be affirmed.
We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Searls, C.
By the COURT.—Por the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 P. 402, 2 Cal. Unrep. 745, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daggett-v-vanderslice-cal-1887.