Daggett v. Mead
11 Abb. N. Cas. 116
This text of 11 Abb. N. Cas. 116 (Daggett v. Mead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Daggett v. Mead, 11 Abb. N. Cas. 116 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
Opinion
[Without opinion.]—“Ordered, that the referee’s report be confirmed and that plaintiff have judgment according to the usual practice of the court for the amount named in the referee’s report, with interest from its date.
“No costs or disbursements are allowed.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Healy v. Murphy
16 N.Y.S. 541 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1891)
Dryer v. Brown
5 Silv. Sup. 549 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Larkins v. Maxon
1 Silv. Ct. App. 215 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)
Krill v. Brownell
47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 72 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Overheiser v. Morehouse
2 How. Pr. 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Hall v. Edmunds
67 How. Pr. 202 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Abb. N. Cas. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daggett-v-mead-nysupct-1882.