Daggett v. Mead

11 Abb. N. Cas. 116
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1882·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Murray, J.

[Without opinion.]—“Ordered, that the referee’s report be confirmed and that plaintiff have judgment according to the usual practice of the court for the amount named in the referee’s report, with interest from its date.

“No costs or disbursements are allowed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daggett v. Mead, 11 Abb. N. Cas. 116 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

11 Abb. N. Cas. 116 (Daggett v. Mead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Healy v. Murphy
16 N.Y.S. 541 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1891)
Dryer v. Brown
5 Silv. Sup. 549 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Larkins v. Maxon
1 Silv. Ct. App. 215 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)
Krill v. Brownell
47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 72 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Overheiser v. Morehouse
2 How. Pr. 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Hall v. Edmunds
67 How. Pr. 202 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)