Daggett v. Laws & Co.

62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 656
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 1900
DocketNo. 6342
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 656 (Daggett v. Laws & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daggett v. Laws & Co., 62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 656 (Ohio 1900).

Opinion

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby reversed for the reason that on view of the conversation appearing in the record as to the employment being for a year or by the year, the question is whether the employment was for a year or not should have been submitted to the jury under proper instructions from the court. And proceeding to render such judgment as the Circuit Court should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common [657]*657pleas be, and the same is rendered and a new trial granted, and this cause is remanded to the court of common pleas of Hamilton county for a new trial and such further proceedings as are authorized by law. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff in error recover from the defendant in error his costs in this court and in the circuit court.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daggett-v-laws-co-ohio-1900.