Dadic v. Farach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dadic v. Farach

673 So. 2d 505, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1996 WL 180318

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 17, 1996

DocketNo. 95-0898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 505 (Dadic v. Farach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dadic v. Farach, 673 So. 2d 505, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1996 WL 180318 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their amended complaint, seeking to vacate a judgment entered in a separate action. Appellants’ claim is based on allegations of Appellees’ “fraud on the court” in the other case. We affirm.

Viewing the allegations and making all inferences most favorably to Appellants, it is clear they alleged only intrinsic fraud, not extrinsic. Nor did Appellants demonstrate how they could further amend the complaint to state extrinsic fraud. Therefore, the trial court did not err in dismissing with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. De-Claire v. Yohanan, 453 So.2d 375 (Fla.1984); Wescott v. Wescott, 444 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

As to Appellees’ cross-appeal, we also affirm.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and GROSS, JJ.„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI