Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal

Supreme Court of Florida

Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal

172 So. 2d 450, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3251

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 3, 1965

DocketNo. 33831

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 2d 450 (Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal, 172 So. 2d 450, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3251 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date September 8, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date September 8, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 2d 450, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dade-neon-sign-service-v-vidal-fla-1965.