Dade County v. McCahill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dade County v. McCahill

114 So. 2d 9

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 1959·No. No. 59-124·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case challenges that part of a judgment in eminent domain which is for certain attorney’s fees allowed to the attorney for appellees, based on a [10] directed verdict therefor. The facts and questions involved are similar to those raised and considered on the cross-appeal in Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 8, decided this date. On authority of that case the judgment is reversed in part, that is, as to the allowance of such attorney fees, and the cause remanded for a new trial only as to the said attorney fees.

It is so ordered.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case challenges that part of a judgment in eminent domain which is for certain attorney’s fees allowed to the attorney for appellees, based on a [10] directed verdict therefor. The facts and questions involved are similar to those raised and considered on the cross-appeal in Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 8, decided this date. On authority of that case the judgment is reversed in part, that is, as to the allowance of such attorney fees, and the cause remanded for a new trial only as to the said attorney fees.

It is so ordered.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Dade County v. McCahill, 114 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

114 So. 2d 9 (Dade County v. McCahill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related