Dade County v. Davidson

418 So. 2d 1231
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 7, 1982
Docket82-422
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 418 So. 2d 1231 (Dade County v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dade County v. Davidson, 418 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

418 So.2d 1231 (1982)

DADE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Stanley S. DAVIDSON and Judith L. Davidson, His Wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 82-422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 7, 1982.
Rehearing Denied October 1, 1982.

Robert A. Ginsburg, Dade County Atty. and R.A. Cuevas, Jr., Asst. County Atty., for appellant.

Brigham, Reynolds, Moore, Muir & Gaylord, Miami, and Andrew H. Schuster, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

FERGUSON, Judge.

Appeal of amount of compensation award in eminent domain proceeding by Dade County, successful petitioner,[1] operated as a stay of trial proceedings, under Rule 9.310(b)(2), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, but did not preclude the trial court from entering a non-final order retaining jurisdiction to tax reasonable costs where, as here, the taxing of costs would not affect or interfere with the subject matter of the plenary appeal or impinge on the appellate court's power and authority to *1232 decide the issues raised.[2]Bailey v. Bailey, 392 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The jurisdiction of the appellate court is exclusive only as to the subject matter of the appeal. Willey v. W.J. Hoggson Corp., 89 Fla. 446, 105 So. 126 (1925). Although the appeal of an eminent domain award automatically operated as a stay of the proceedings, the trial court may retain jurisdiction to decide matters collateral to the appeal. See Sunrise Beach, Inc. v. Phillips, 181 So.2d 169, 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

Affirmed.

NOTES

[1] Section 73.091, Florida Statutes (1979) has placed the entire responsibility for costs of a condemnation proceeding on the petitioner.

[2] A cost judgment was not rendered here, so the issue of its reasonableness did not arise. If a cost determination is made after the entry of a final judgment and appeal has already been taken, review of the cost award is available to petitioner by separate appeal. Chatlos v. Hallandale, 220 So.2d 353 (Fla. 1969); League of Mercy Assoc., Inc. v. Walt, 376 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garber v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.
687 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
McGurn v. Scott
596 So. 2d 1042 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Finst Development, Inc. v. Bemaor
449 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Dade County v. Southeast (U.S.) Recycling Corp.
422 So. 2d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 So. 2d 1231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dade-county-v-davidson-fladistctapp-1982.